The Xinhuanet article is specifically about that part of the General Rules (Article 184) that can be called a “Good Samaritan” law. Many of my generation and earlier were attacked and beaten simply for being Jewish and the murderers of God! After all, we were around for quite a while beforehand and were the fertile inspiration on which they sprouted. If an individual knows she is legally encouraged to provide help to those in need and protected from liability when doing so, she may be more likely to provide aid than she otherwise would be. For example, a doctor in … Our version of their origin is told in the Bible (2 Kings 17). get the best of the algemeiner straight to your inbox! The New Testament is a document predicated on the assumption that Judaism was hijacked by rabbis who betrayed its biblical mission. That was how the Samaritans came to adopt the Bible. The issue is not as straightforward as it might appear. One ideal example of the moral vs. immoral viewpoint is outlined by the Good Samaritan Law. It’s a weird kind of Good Samaritan law, though, because it doesn’t solve the problem people in China were worried about and instead solves a problem nobody seems to have. Should those who do not go to help be prosecuted or just condemned morally? Good Samaritan laws are often confused with “Duty to Help” laws, which most civil systems avoid, and which require citizens to go to the aid of others who are in … Earlier rabbis, like Hillel, expressed almost identical ideas to many of those to be found much later in Christianity. Perhaps the most important benefit that Good Samaritan laws provide is that they make it difficult for a victim to take advantage of a good Samaritan. To “Jew” someone was to cheat them. Ignored by passing Jews, he is helped by a good Samaritan. Published 21 October 2014 From: Ministry of Justice. The Good Samaritan Law is a law that protects civilians who help people they believe to be injured or otherwise in danger. Some of these are less obligations to help as much as protections for those who do. In 1964 New York, people may not have helped because the chances were high, in those crime ridden days, that a responder would himself be attacked. Every person lives by their own ideals of what is “good” and what they think is “bad.” One ideal example of the moral vs. immoral viewpoint is outlined by the Good Samaritan Law. Good Samaritan laws are often confused with “Duty to Help” laws, which most civil systems avoid, and which require citizens to go to the aid of others who are in danger or being attacked. He in turn sent instructions to Judea to go and instruct them. The Good Samaritan sounds better than a simple command. They claimed it was an inauthentic post-Babylonian invention. When the responder is a trained medical professional, this can mean facing an immense amount of pressure to provide a high level of care despite being unprepared to do so. In 1964, Kitty Genovese was stabbed to death late one night in Queens, New York, by Winton Mosely — who said that he simply wanted to kill a woman. A recent episode of “Girls” also referred to the Kitty Genovese case. Among other Good Samaritan law pros and cons is the incentive they give individuals to provide aid when they deem it necessary. I understand that you can make your point better with a story, a parable. The touching yet tragic effect that Georgia’s Good Samaritan Law has on those that would otherwise offer assistance to someone injured has proven to have the strong influence concerning automobile accidents. The issue is still debated. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google, Were God Merely to ‘Exist,’ Our Prayers Would Be Meaningless, French Court Sentences Holocaust Denier Vincent Reynouard to New Jail Term, British MPs Outraged Over Antisemitic Responses to Amazon Alexa Questions, Netanyahu: ‘We’re Flying at Breakneck Speed Into a New Era in the Middle East’, British Archaeologist Finds ‘Likely’ Birthplace of Jesus Beneath Modern-Day Convent in Nazareth. With the help of Ezra and Nehemiah, the Judeans succeeded, and thereafter the Samaritans lost their supremacy. Read More: What Is the Good Samaritan Law? Some, like Alabama’s Good Samaritan law, specifically exclude responders who engage in reckless behavior, gross negligence or intentional misconduct from legal protection. The general rule is that individuals have no duty to act, but if they do act, they are held to a standard of care to not act with gross negligence. In some jurisdictions, such as Nevada, the law includes language specific to certain types of first responder and particular circumstances. They exiled the aristocrats and skilled artisans to Babylon, where the Jewish community eventually reestablished itself. That individual is then able to assist in good faith without the fear of legal action. But the problem with all laws of this type is that they do not address the specific problem we see in China. There have been cases both in the US and China where people going to help someone have been sued either for interference or inappropriate medical responses. Beyond the potential for a bystander to face criminal charges for failing to provide aid, Good Samaritan law pros and cons include laws that require bystanders to provide aid to their best ability. Laborer's Health and Safety Fund of North America: Good Samaritan Laws: What Exactly Do They Protect? There is a counter-principle that says you should NOT intentionally sacrifice your own life for someone else’s — but where the chance is unlikely, you should risk it.