2020. champfish says: October 15, 2014 at 3:20 am. The objective of this study is to analyze the rights of employees to health and safety in the workplace in regards to the scenario as follows: BIBLIOGRAPHY Retrieved on November 9, 2011 from http://www.scu.edu/ethics/publications/iie/v2n1/calculating.html Copyright 2020 . Change ), You are commenting using your Twitter account. DoRight has recently been hired as the President of the "Universal Human Care Hospital," where he oversees all departments with over 5,000 employees and over 20,000 patients at the medical facility. (2003) Because the human beings are rational self-interested creatures, says Bentham, they seek to maximize their pleasure and minimize their pain. To help us identify those laws which are morally binding Kant has provided us with the ultimate calculus: the ‘categorical imperative’ which states ‘Act only in accordance with the maxim through which you can at the same time will that it become a universal law’. What matters, they argue, is that we do what is right what is right, and what is right is that which conforms to moral law. Utilitarianism vs Deontology . In this ethical system, the ethical actor functions as a moral observer, dispassionately making decisions without regard to him or herself or his or her personal investment in the decision. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. These are associated with morality. Change ), You are commenting using your Google account. Deontological ethics is an ethics system that judges whether an action is right or wrong based on a moral code. > What are some examples of Utilitarianism vs deontology problem? (1996). In this paper I will discuss why I feel Deontology (Immanuel Kant's philosophy) is more correct than Utilitarianism (John Stuart Mill), as applied to a specific issue. Utilitarianism is a moral theory that argues that an action is right if and only if it conforms to the principle of utility. The problem, in my opinion, of finding the downfalls in moral theories is that one can only use moral theories to determine whether moral theories are ‘right’. However, while I will give some detail on the shortcomings of both theories, as we are discussing ethical theories, drawing on these examples, I suggest that you seek specific concrete examples yourself. Deontology vs. Utilitarianism THE RIGHT CHOICE Deontology is an ethical theory, which states actions should be performed according a previously ranked set of values (Johnson, 1996). That is, they are concerned with fulfilling (what they believe is) their moral duty – whether or not it makes people happy. Unlike religious deontological t… Explanation: In Kant's The, Employee's Rights to Health and Safety in the Workplace One of the leading exponents of this theory is Immanuel Kant. Deontology vs utilitarianism? Deontology is a non-consequentialist moral theory. The founder of deontological ethics was a German philosopher named Immanuel Kant. 2020, https://www.paperdue.com/essay/deontology-vs-utilitarianism-the-right-choice-52800, Utilitarianism, Deontology, Virtue Ethics Utilitarianism (also called consequentialism) is a moral theory developed and refined in the modern world in the writings of Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) and John Stuart Mill (1806-1873). Moreover, any ethical principle, such as the Greatest Happiness Principle, that advocates that the happiness of the majority takes precedence over the minority cannot be counted as a reliable ethical model. 2) to look out for the best interests of the client; avoiding the temptation to take advantage of the client; and 3) to serve the public interest. The problem, in my opinion, of finding the downfalls in moral theories is that one can only use moral theories to determine whether moral theories are ‘right’. I am given a situation where there are 7 people on a boat, and I have to decide who to push over in order to save the other. Competence is derived from a synthesis, Philosophy: Deontology vs. Utilitarianism Calculating consequences: the utilitarian approach to ethics. Macmillan: Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 1) to be competent and know about the art and science of accounting; The primary difference between deontology and utilitarianism, two competing systems of ethics, is that the former system is concerned with whether an act is intrinsically right or wrong, while the latter system believes that only the consequences of an act are important. He has been provided with. For Kant, right actions are those which are done purely and simply from a sense of duty and not by following impulses, inclinations, or adherence to the ‘Greatest Happiness Principle’. Learn how your comment data is processed. Kant stated that a universal law should provide the basis for each act, and that the intention was of more importance than the result. Consequences of those actions are not taken into consideration. Think specifically about how the theories would work in a concrete situation. Utilitarian Ethics Vs Deontology 1515 Words | 7 Pages. Once we know what it is that we are duty bound to do morally, then we can carry out this ‘natural’ right action regardless of the consequences. First I will give an interpretation of Kant's deontology, and point out the strong and logical points within his arguments; secondly I will offer an analysis of Mill's Utilitarianism, and why I feel Mill's views fall short.