For instance, most people would agree that lying is wrong. […] Consequentialist vs. deontological: litmus test Showing 1-9 of 9 messages. Consequentialists state that maximum happiness achieved is what is good; the actions that maximize this good are right. One of the most stated examples of this concept is in nursing. It concentrates on the correctness and wrongness of actions based on how well the rules of duty and responsibility were followed. The main difference between deontology and consequentialism is that deontology focuses on the rightness or wrongness of actions themselves. Where do an-caps fall? We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Then again, if she does not tell him, it may be mentally traumatic for him to know whether he is going to live or die. These opinions can differ from person to person. Consequentialism The results matter, not the actions themselves. For instance, consider an individual who is the bank manager, and his own son has been caught in the act of robbing the bank. Whereas, consequentialism focuses on the consequences of the action. Copyright © Opinion Front & Buzzle.com, Inc. I'm approaching anarcho-capitalism from a deontological point of view, chiefly because my prior approach to life was a consequentialist one and frankly, that stopped working for me. It does not hold true if the two requirements are in conflict. 28-31; “Normative Ethics,” 2002; Sinnott-Armstrong, 2006) Deontological ethical theory takes its name from the Greek root “deon,” meaning “that which is obligatory. The central question is, ‘What kind of a person should I be?’ Thus, virtue ethics do not concentrate on the correctness of the act, but the moral conduct of the agent who is performing the act. 6789 Quail Hill Pkwy, Suite 211 Irvine CA 92603. Deontologists state that the right action performed or the state of affairs that led to the right action are good, while the fact that the action was done in accordance with the set rules is right. A person’s morality may be judged on a number of factors. The theory takes root from utilitarianism, and stresses on the fact that the morality of an action depends on its consequences. It is different from both the above concepts as it concentrates completely on virtues and ideals. It stresses on the fact that morality of a person or action depend on how ideal the character traits are. Immanuel Kant, a famous deontologist, is considered to have formulated modern deontological ethics, which stresses on the fact that the morality of a person is dependent on how well he fulfills his duties and obligations. The essence is to do the task, according to how right it is presumed to be. We've created informative articles that you can come back to again and again when you have questions or want to learn more! Of these, consequentialism determines the rightness … Consequentialist vs. deontological: litmus test: Rex: 12/30/08 1:47 AM: What is a simple question I could ask a laypeson to determine whether he/she primarily has a consequentialist view of morality or a deontological view? We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. Under consequentialism, however, an action is right if the consequence is completely good. Consequentialism focuses on the consequences or results of an action. Consequentialist vs Deontological Ethics. However, there is a difference between deontological ethics and moral absolutism. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website.