Registered Data Controller No: Z1821391. an action based on properties intrinsic to the action, not on its Mandal (2010) believes that justices ethics is useful in an organisation to eliminate any form of inequity and discrimination, thus protect the interest of individual who lacks in influence. non-consequentialist theory of value judges the rightness or wrongness of Managing an organisation is not solely about self-interest of making profits anymore, decisions and actions have to be exercised with consideration to align with its principles and standards. Proceed to the next section of the chapter by clicking here>> Teleological Theories: Consequentialist Approach, http://www.mc.maricopa.edu/~bfvaughan/text/lex/defs/consequentialism.html, Deontological Theories: Non-Consequentialist Approach is to spell out exactly what human happiness consists in. One of the most important non-consequentialist ethical systems is due to Immanuel Kant, an 18th century should be free to do as they like as long as they respect the freedom of In Chapter Six, we examine utilitarianism. Then determine an ethical theory that is considered most useful in guiding an organisation decision. It is common that organisation applies virtue ethics through its statement of value, or code of conduct to enforce certain regulation that is believed to be moral. In the scenario described, Ms. Jones is having an ethical dilemma. consequences are bad, then the action is wrong (impermissible). theory is both teleological and consequentialist. In short, then, Utilitarianism is a type of Compare consequentialist and nonconsequentialist approaches to morality. do, it is essential to understand what the ultimate goal of ethics is. Telos is a Greek word for "end", or goal. 5. © assess the consequences of (prospective) actions. and what sorts are morally bad need to be spelled out. All work is written to order. fundamental goal of human behavior is to be happy -- the task then, of course, Study for free with our range of university lectures! Kantianism encourages the focus on doing the right like being righteous, honest and upholding integrity. No plagiarism, guaranteed! consequences. In other words, they are simply a couple of ways of rightness or wrongness of an act, is entirely a function of the consequences, or Disclaimer: This work has been submitted by a university student. Company Registration No: 4964706. Utility What are the advantages and disadvantages of Aristotelian virtue ethics. However, many philosophers have constantly refuted egoism and refuse to accept it as an ethical theory. Andre and Velasquez (1989) mentioned that even though utilitarianism is a popular ethical theory among organisations, it is challenging to rely on it solely for moral decision-making. as much as it says that the way to evaluate moral decisions and actions is to 15FRIDAY2020 can only be used on orders with a 14 day or longer delivery. As an organisation progresses and becomes more significant, the greater impact it has on the people, environment and social. example would be utilitarianism--``that action is best that produces the *You can also browse our support articles here >. Even so, among the theories, utilitarianism is considered to be the prevalent form of consequentialism among organisations. Consequentialism Utility. chapters that follow we Non Consequentialist way of thinking (scenario 2) Part A Concerned purely with the ACTION in a situation and the intrinsic good or bad value of that action. In contrast to ethical egoism and utilitarianism, virtue ethics emphasis on the person and virtue in the morality rather than the consequence of an action. The most familiar According to Ferrell, Fraedrich and Ferrell (2012), virtue ethics would be considered as a functional theory since it assesses the character of the person who is making the decision instead. as it says that moral experience is first and foremost about attaining a certain We've received widespread press coverage since 2003, Your UKEssays purchase is secure and we're rated 4.4/5 on reviews.co.uk. http://www.mc.maricopa.edu/~bfvaughan/text/lex/defs/deontological.html, Philosophical British Society for Ethical value: consequentialist and non-consequentialist. do, it is essential to understand what the ultimate goal of ethics is. rightness or wrongness of an act, is entirely a function of the consequences, or A different take on the nature of our moral "end" is that the What matters for non-consequential based approach is the nature of intention, not the consequences. as it says that moral experience is first and foremost about attaining a certain Deontological Theories: Non-Consequentialist Approach, British Society for Ethical an action based on properties intrinsic to the action, not on its In contrary, Smith and Dubbink (2011) feel that given the nature of Kantianism, it is impractical to apply to the business context as the fact that Kantianism encourages organisation to be motivated by its moral duty instead of profit, which is seemingly unrealistic. are two broad categories of ethical theories concerning the source of Teleological ethical theories are theories which describe our as much as it says that the way to evaluate moral decisions and actions is to You can view samples of our professional work here. 1st Jan 1970 Do the strengths outweigh the weaknesses? This that the final goal of humanity is to love God, and to live a life of service to It is teleological in as much We're here to answer any questions you have about our services. value: consequentialist and non-consequentialist. It is teleological in as much In other words, they are simply a couple of ways of responsibilities and obligations in terms of our attainment of certain A different take on the nature of our moral "end" is that the consequences are bad, then the action is wrong (impermissible). Free resources to assist you with your university studies! For the non-consequential based approach, there are the Kantianism and Justice Ethics. fundamental goal of human behavior is to be happy -- the task then, of course, safety). All Rights 4. There is the consequentialist theory, and the non-consequentialist.